Beware that latest Oracle JDK installers will REMOVE older JDK installs of that version
Bug I've reported: Adobe Tracker email notifications seem to have ceased in 2024
Bug I've reported: CF Admin update page mistakenly lists current version in "Available Versions"
New updates released for Java 8, 11, 17, 21, and 22 as of Apr 16 2024: resources and thoughts
Recordings available for the recent 17-session Adobe ColdFusion Summit Online 2024
Delighted to be presenting at CFCamp 2024, on "Using Redis for session storage in ACF and Lucee"
Does Oracle's change regarding Java apply only to "commercial" use, or to ANY production use?
Charlie Arehart said:
Which "license" are you referring to. You make some bold statements, as if I or others hav
...
[more]
Does Oracle's change regarding Java apply only to "commercial" use, or to ANY production use?
Videogamer555 said:
My interpretation is that the word "production" specifically means "making a product&
...
[more]
Bug I've reported: Adobe Tracker email notifications seem to have ceased in 2024
Charlie Arehart said:
James, on your second paragraph, are you talking perhaps about changes to the status, like "to
...
[more]
How to disable the Asus NumberPad, embedded within touchpad on some modern laptops
Charlie Arehart said:
Praveen, see the tldr above.
I did the "story" first (as I learned on my own and more fr
...
[more]
How to disable the Asus NumberPad, embedded within touchpad on some modern laptops
Praveen said:
Why dont you make it simple istead of F**king long story..
But sure, people can have all kinds of expectations, so thanks for heading off that one.
In any case, at least with the heads-up, I hope more people can be prepared. :-)
Am I to understand that installing the latest Java 17 SDK will /remove/ installations of Java 8, Java 11, etc?
I work in digital archiving and cannot randomly lose access to older versions of Java! I am so so so so tired of this. So it goes.
I would love to hear in simple terms if this removes current installations. Please help.
I elaborated still further in the first paragraph, that "the new Oracle jdk installer WILL REMOVE any previous updates of that JVM version that were created by previous JDK installers of that same major version". Again, note "that version".
I even repeated it in the first tldr bullet point, and still later. :-) I really tried to avoid confusion on that point, so it's sad to find somehow it was not enough. But sincere intent can be lost in a sea of words. I hope if anyone else may have the question, this response to you should help.
To be clear, the recent change in JVM installers (discussed here) will NOT cause them to remove older installs of OTHER versions of the JVM, only other installs of THAT version (and even then only those that were implemented using the JVM installer for that version--not those implemented using the JVM's available "zip" install option.)
But let me know if you think I should offer some more specific phrase in the text. I ask that sincerely.
But second, even someone who read the technote for the update (as I did, when that update came out in July 2023) could be forgiven for not noticing news of this change. It's only mentioned in passing way down the note--and indicated in dealing with a possible error that could result, as if they felt folks already knew the change would be happening in that update ("the July 2023 CPU" as it refers to itself) at:
https://www.oracle.c...
Without more info there, it's also unclear if that was a change only for the Windows installer or also Linux and MacOS. Anyone know yet?
I'll add that I searched that technote page for all references to "install" (there were over 30),but this was the only one suggesting this change in behavior. That sure seems odd.
So again, thanks. I'll tweak the post to mention this, and I'll point to these comments for more news that may come along.